Community Risk Assessment
Percentages reflect relative distribution within a small reporting sample (6 reports).
Evidence Status
Community Reporting Summary
6 independent community reports have been recorded for this number.
Reported classifications are distributed across multiple classification types, including classifications such as scam, suspicious, spam, and legitimate, indicating no dominant behavioural pattern at this time.
Number Metadata
Observed Interaction Types
- Scam
- 2 community reports
- Suspicious
- 2 community reports
- Spam
- 1 community report
- Legitimate
- 1 community report
Safety Context
Current reporting does not indicate a consistent behavioural pattern or dominant risk classification. Standard telecommunications safety precautions are generally advised when responding to unexpected or unsolicited contact.
About This Record
This page forms part of the Reverseau public safety intelligence database, which aggregates community-reported telecommunications safety information across Australia.
Records update automatically as new reports are submitted. Records may exist prior to receiving community reports in order to support proactive telecommunications safety monitoring and future reporting.
Reverseau maintains this database as a continuously updated public safety dataset designed to support telecommunications risk awareness across Australia. Reverseau does not determine liability, intent, or identity. Records reflect aggregated community-submitted signals only.
Contribute a Community Safety Report
Additional reports help improve classification confidence and public safety awareness.
SUBMIT A SAFETY REPORTReports contribute anonymised observational data used for pattern analysis.
Community Safety Reports
Classifications reflect anonymised community-submitted reports and represent observed interaction patterns only. They do not identify callers or constitute verified findings.
Pattern status reflects statistical distribution of community reports and does not indicate verified activity.
These reports contribute to the Community Risk Level and Confidence assessment shown above.
The following reports are user-submitted and not independently verified. Consider them alongside the aggregated signals above.
This call was wild! An AI scammer pretending to be human pitched me some super cheap wine. Couldn't miss the awkward pauses and him saying the same stuff over and over. When I asked him for a biscuit recipe instead, I felt like I was waiting for a snail to finish its race! Total scam alert!
Here we go again! Another shady number kicking off with 03 7053, ending with 3913, 3918, 3919, 3982, 3920, 3950, and 3980. Keep an eye out, something's not right!
Crikey, I'm getting bombarded with 4 to 8 annoying calls every bloody day! Did someone decide to auction off my phone number or what?
This number keeps ringing me, and it's always silent on the other end. They never leave a message, so I've blocked them because I reckon it's a scam or spam.
Wine concierge club.
This phone number appears to be a scam, as it starts with (03) 7053 and has multiple numbers that end in 3913, 3918, 3919, 3982, 3920, and 3950. It seems to be a common tactic used by scammers.
Community reports are retained as historical safety signals within the Reverseau telecommunications safety dataset and may reflect different experiences over time.
Contribute a Community Safety Report
Additional reports help improve classification confidence and public safety awareness.
SUBMIT A SAFETY REPORTReports contribute anonymised observational data used for pattern analysis.