Automated systems handle pre-screening and help organise report data into readable page content.
Flagged and high-risk submissions go to a moderator. People always have the final say.
Spot something wrong? You can request a review and correction at any time.
Purpose of AI Use
Automation on Reverseau is deliberately narrow. It covers two things: triaging incoming reports before a moderator sees them, and producing the on-page data breakdowns that appear on each phone detail page.
Every phone number classification originates from a real person describing a genuine call experience. The automated layer organises and presents that data - it never generates it. The only inputs these systems work with are user-submitted reports and ACMA numbering allocation records. No external sources, inferred claims, or independent legitimacy assessments come into play.
Boundaries and Non-Capabilities
These rules apply across every automated system on the platform:
- No identity verification or legal determinations. Classifications reflect what people have reported - not an automated judgement about who owns or operates a number.
- No report creation. Every submission comes from a real person. Automation cannot fabricate, embellish, or supplement what someone wrote.
- No external data injection. On-page breakdowns draw only from existing submissions and ACMA records. Nothing is inferred or pulled from outside this dataset.
- No private data access. Only publicly available information and voluntarily submitted content are processed.
- No editorial authorship. Informational pages, policy documents, and blog articles are written by people.
- No final moderation authority. When a moderator and the automated system disagree, the moderator wins.
Every classification published on Reverseau traces back to a real person's report. Automation handles organisation and presentation; Reverseau takes final responsibility for what appears on the platform.
What AI Does
There are two specific areas where automation plays a role. Below is what each one does, and where it stops.
Report Pre-Screening (Triage)
When someone submits a report, an automated check runs before a moderator sees it. This step flags:
- Spam, gibberish, or irrelevant content
- Profanity, hate speech, or personal attacks
- Personal identifying information (names, addresses, ID numbers)
- Duplicate or near-duplicate submissions
Clean submissions go straight to the publication workflow. Anything flagged lands with a human moderator first. This is purely a triage step - it cannot approve or reject a report on its own.
Phone Number Page Breakdowns
Each phone detail page includes an AI-assisted breakdown that pulls from aggregated reports and ACMA allocation data. These describe reported call patterns and behaviour without introducing claims beyond what the underlying data contains. Every breakdown carries a visible disclosure label and is regenerated periodically as new reports come in.
Known Limitations
Working with community-sourced data at scale comes with inherent constraints:
- Low-volume bias - when only a handful of reports exist for a number, the breakdown may lean too heavily on the dominant category
- Mixed-signal ambiguity - conflicting classifications can produce vague language that does not fully capture the range of reported experiences
- Allocation vs. routing - location and provider data comes from ACMA allocation records and may not reflect actual caller routing, number porting, or spoofing
- Temporal lag - breakdowns regenerate periodically, not in real-time, so recent reports may not yet appear
- Compression risk - minority report details can get lost in favour of high-level patterns; reading the individual reports gives the full picture
For a deeper look at dataset constraints, see Data Limitations.
Human Oversight
No report goes live without passing through moderation controls. Flagged or high-risk submissions must be reviewed by a person first. Here is how that works in practice:
- Pre-screening triage - automation flags submissions that may breach content guidelines
- Human moderation - a moderator reviews flagged items for accuracy and guideline compliance
- Breakdown review - page breakdowns are re-examined when a report is disputed or a correction request arrives
- Override authority - moderators can overturn any automated decision at any time
Accuracy and Corrections
If anything on Reverseau - whether AI-assisted or submitted by a contributor - is inaccurate or misleading, you can request a review through our contact page. This applies to:
- AI-assisted page breakdowns
- Contributor-submitted reports
- Phone number classifications
- Informational page content
We aim to respond within 30 days. Anything confirmed as inaccurate will be corrected or removed. For the full data correction process, see our Privacy Policy.
Found an inaccuracy or have a question?
Include the phone number URL and the section you are referring to.
Request a Correction Ask a Question